This is quite a courageous exercise to bring to a leadership team – and yes, it can be done very practically if facilitated with the right tone and structure. The “Elephants, Dead Fish, and Vomit” exercise (from Gifford Thomas / the NeuroLeadership approach) is a powerful metaphorical tool for surfacing hidden issues, unspoken tensions, and emotional “baggage” in a team. Here’s how to run it step-by-step:
To create a psychologically safe space where leaders can name and release what’s holding the team back – unspoken concerns (“elephants”), unresolved past issues (“dead fish”), and personal frustrations (“vomit”) – so the team can move forward with greater trust, clarity, and focus.
You might say:
“Today we’re doing something called Elephants, Dead Fish, and Vomit. It’s a way to surface what’s unsaid so we can move forward together.”
Give each person sticky notes or index cards.Ask them to write (one per note):
Encourage honesty and clarity – no naming/blaming; focus on issues and impact.
Create three labelled spaces on the wall or whiteboard: “Elephants,” “Dead Fish,” “Vomit.”One by one, participants post their notes and explain (briefly) if they want.
You can decide whether this is:
As a facilitator, group similar themes together.
Lead a structured discussion:
Encourage empathy: “Listen to understand, not to respond.”
For Elephants, agree on how to address them going forward.For Dead Fish, decide what needs closure.For Vomit, allow catharsis and don’t dwell – it’s about release, not debate.
End by moving from venting → vision:
Optionally, symbolically dispose of the notes (rip them up, shred them, etc.) – signalling a reset.
The success or failure of “Elephants, Dead Fish, and Vomit” depends less on the metaphors themselves and more on how well you frame the psychological contract – i.e., the rules of engagement.
Here’s a set of practical, field-tested ground rules you can use with a leadership team to keep the session honest but not hostile, courageous but not personal, and action-oriented but emotionally safe.
To create a shared container that allows for candour and accountability without blame or defensiveness. The facilitator should set these upfront, display them visibly (flipchart/slide), and re-ground the group in them when emotions rise.
Encourage self-accountability. Participants should own their perspective rather than diagnosing or blaming others.
Facilitator line: “We’re not here to label each other’s behaviour, we’re here to share our experience of the system we’re all part of.”
Keep comments at the systemic or behavioural level, not about individuals.
This keeps the discussion constructive and forward-looking.
Remind the group that everyone in the room is trying to do the right thing – even when it lands poorly.
“We assume everyone here is operating from a good place, even if impact and intent don’t always align.”
If you name an issue that involves someone not in the room, frame it as your experience, not a third-party accusation.
“I’ve noticed tension between teams,” not “They’re always the problem.”
When someone shares, others listen – not explain, defend, or debate.
“Thank you for naming that,” rather than “That’s not what happened.”You can process or respond later when the group reflects together.
“What’s said here stays here.”But also: “What’s learned here leaves here.”This allows openness in the moment, while ensuring insights are used responsibly outside the room.
Encourage people to say what needs to be said, not what’s easy.
“If it feels slightly uncomfortable, you’re probably in the right zone.”
If someone crosses into personal territory, the facilitator gently redirects:“Can you restate that as a behaviour or pattern, not a person?”
Use structured rounds or time limits to prevent dominance or silence.
“We want all voices heard – especially the quieter ones.”
It’s okay to be frustrated or even tearful – that shows investment.But emotions are not tools to guilt or shame others.
“To make this work, we need to agree on how we’ll show up. These rules aren’t about restricting conversation – they’re about protecting it. They help us stay courageous without being careless.
Let’s review them together and see if there’s anything you’d add or change – because you’ll be the ones holding each other to them.”
Having the group co-create or confirm the rules increases ownership and self-regulation.
Before starting the sharing, ask:
“Who’s willing to call it out if we drift from these rules?”
Nominate one or two process guardians (participants, not facilitator) who can gently pause and reset the group if it becomes personal or unproductive.
“Rules of Engagement” For “Elephants, Dead Fish & Vomit” – Leadership Team Exercise
To create a safe, courageous space where we surface what’s unsaid – without blame, defensiveness, or personal attack – so we can move forward together with trust and clarity.
| 1 | Speak from the “I” | Share your own experience, not others’. “I feel…” instead of “You always…” |
| 2 | Focus on Patterns, Not People | Talk about behaviours or team dynamics, not individuals. “We tend to…” not “Tom does…” |
| 3 | Assume Positive Intent | Everyone here wants the team to succeed – we might just have different perspectives. |
| 4 | No Fixing or Defending in the moment | When someone shares, we listen to understand – not to justify or debate. |
| 5 | Confidentiality with Integrity | What’s said here stays here.What’s learned here leaves here. |
| 6 | Courage Over Comfort | Say what needs to be said, even if it’s uncomfortable – that’s where growth happens. |
| 7 | Name the Behaviour, Not the Person | Address the action or impact, not who did it. |
| 8 | Equal Air Time | Every voice matters. Speak once before you speak twice. |
| 9 | Respect Emotion, Don’t Weaponise It | It’s okay to express feeling – not to use it to blame or shame. |
| 10 | We Own the Elephants Together | If it’s in the room, it’s our issue – not someone’s issue. |
“We agree to hold ourselves and each other accountable to these rules – to speak truth with respect, listen with curiosity, and focus on what will move us forward.”