The importance of feedback: “Am I heard?” “Do I matter?” “am I developing”?” does my people leader know what I need”? “Am I doing what is expected of me”?
Feedback is an intrinsic part of self-regulation and growth. Giving and receiving feedback is critical to positive and healthy organisational culture. Giving and receiving feedback supports the ability to improve performance and achieve goals. It is a two-way process. However, while it is important for a manager to provide feedback to employees regularly, it is equally important for the manager to be able to receive feedback from employees.
Employees want and need feedback from their managers and leaders. Knowing if they are doing well or need to adjust their development keeps them focused, motivated and confident. Giving constructive feedback builds confidence and self-efficacy and increases motivation.
If delivered constructively, feedback motivates employees, and motivation is a key function of success. Unmotivated employees are unlikely to be engaged, fulfilled, and interested in their work. Celebrate successes more.
An intrinsic part of coaching and mentoring, and self-development is the concept of feedback. We all may not be as self-aware as we think, we may have blind spots, and our perception of self may be distorted; feedback it’s a 2-way process; and multi-dimensional, both positive and developmental and up and down the organisation.
Listen to the below short Ted Talk from Leann Renninger (5 mins). Giving feedback is about quality conversations – how to say difficult messages well. The Quality of the conversation determines the Quality of the relationship, which determines the Quality of the organisation. It’s all about language and positioning. 3Q
Video link – How to give great feedback
https://www.ted.com/talks/leeann_renninger_the_secret_to_giving_great_feedback?language=enLeeann describes a simple 4-part formula to give feedback successfully – note Confucius. Make feedback ‘brain friendly’ that doesn’t challenge the receiver; note the amygdala! Our unconscious reaction to the new feedback information. We need to be self-aware and compassionate giving and self-compassionate receiving; it’s never easy we need to develop this skill.
At the bottom of this section, you will find a link to a short (8-minute) video introducing the opportunity and how to embrace receiving feedback. Note how we feel receiving feedback and observe the ability and opportunity to grow. It’s always a challenge to hear the difference between how we perceive ourselves and others. Think as Joe Hirsch alludes to think “Feed-forward”, not Feedback.”
How we receive feedback is critical – note Joe’s comments – and take a moment to reflect.
We need to understand that, on receiving feedback, we may come across as:
Video Link – How to embrace receiving feedback
https://www.ted.com/talks/joe_hirsch_the_joy_of_getting_feedback
Giving powerful feedback is more than just telling someone to do something differently. The way you frame and phrase your feedback is extremely important. And that’s where feedback models come in.
Following a feedback model to structure your feedback allows you to deliver feedback more clearly and effectively. It ensures you get your message across and your recipient understands what you’re saying and what’s expected of them.
New feedback models and techniques have emerged in recent years, with management and coaching specialists creating a wide range of feedback models, methods, and tools to implement feedback.
Below are a few examples; you will need to find one that resonates with you, is authentic to you, and dovetails with your organisation's values and culture.; you may find a particular blend works. The important thing to observe is creating a structure. Feedback models help you formulate and deliver your feedback more effectively. It helps you structure what you want to say and how you will say it.
Situation-Behaviour-Impact (SBI)
(The model does not include a recommendation for future action. Therefore, we recommend using the SBI feedback model for positive rather than negative feedback.)
This way of providing feedback aims to help the receiver better understand what impact their actions have had.
Here’s how one would structure feedback with this model.
Phrasing feedback according to this model ensures you clearly outline both the context and the content of your feedback.
The Situation/Task-Action-Result (STAR) feedback model is practically the same as the previous feedback structure yet uses slightly different terms.
(This method of feedback delivery is incredibly popular, but just like with the SBI model, it lacks focus on improvement and change.)
The STAR method:
By delivering your feedback with the STAR technique, you explain the entire scope of the situation and its context, rather than just mentioning if a task went well or not. This method of feedback delivery is incredibly popular, but just like with the SBI model, it lacks focus on improvement and change
Effect-Change/Continue (EEC)
(Does address future actions)
The EEC method:
Rather than just explaining the past, this feedback model also focuses on the future. What should the recipient change to improve their behaviour, output, or work methods? Or perhaps they did a great job, and you want to let them know to keep working this way.
Since you can use this model for both change and continuation, it is suited for both positive and negative feedback.
Note that this model is sometimes also called the AID feedback model:
Identify-Describe-Encourage-Action (IDEA) feedback model.
(With this technique, you actively try to incite change and outline future steps.
The IDEA method:
If you struggle with giving constructive/negative feedback, then the IDEA feedback model might work wonders for you!
Describe-Express-Specify-Consequences (DESC)
(This model because it not only includes the part about future action (just like the EEC and IDEA models) but also takes it one step further.)
The DESC method:
The final step in this feedback method focusses on showing the recipient just what impact they might have if they do it differently. By giving such a practical explanation, you will more easily convince them of the need to change.
It also makes it more difficult for the recipient to refute your feedback as you clearly explain its benefits.
The Pendleton feedback model aims to create a two-way feedback system, rather than one person just giving another person feedback.
The original steps from Pendleton’s model
Although these are the basic steps, the model has since been further expanded and refined. A more elaborate format of Pendleton’s model includes seven steps rather than four.
These seven steps of the feedback process are:
This updated version of the Pendleton model still has the four original steps at its core but includes two introductory steps and the final step to ensure action. Especially the seventh step is useful as it means your feedback will have a clear impact.
The 360-degree feedback model aims to collect feedback from a variety of sources and collates that information to provide someone with a highly detailed performance evaluation.
In general, this is how the 360-degree feedback model works:
Although in reality most companies have their own unique take on the 360-degree review process, the basic format follows these four points.
Also note that the survey questions that are asked in step one are often tailored to a specific company and industry. Therefore, the 360-degree feedback model might look very different depending on the company you work for.
The great part about multi-rater feedback is that it’s not just your boss being the one who evaluates you (as traditionally done in business). Instead, your performance is assessed based on what multiple stakeholders, who might know you in different roles and capacities, have observed.
This produces a much more holistic view of your performance, rather than just one person’s opinion. And that’s beneficial for multiple reasons.
Perhaps you and your direct manager don’t get along that well. Perhaps your manager isn’t actively involved in all the projects you work on, meaning they can’t really assess your performance because they simply can’t keep track of everything you do.
Instead, with the 360-degree review model, you know the full scope of your activities at work is assessed by a variety of sources and from different angles.
Note that this feedback process isn’t a standalone process. Note in these two manuals how these tools and frameworks come to light when combined, and they are influential in helping us develop and grow. Using some below will help you be effective in your feedback style.